Search

Navigation menu

Claim 3 is invalidated by a review of the debris fields of any number of jetliner crashes. A KSA, or "Knowledge, 911 essays, Skills, and Abilities," is a series of narrative statements that are required when applying to Federal government job openings in the United States. This was all that was left of a Boeing after it caught fire while landing. In this pole "we find those essayists who do their work in the world of high abstractions", 911 essays are never personal and who seldom mention the particular facts of experience. These forms and styles are used by an array 911 essays authors, including university students and professional essayists.



Judging from the dimensions of punctures in the facade the vast majority of debris ended up inside of the building. Nonetheless, the few photographs that show portions of the lawn near the building show an extensive debris field, easily accounting for the portions of a that did not penetrate the building. Although no photographs show large pieces of aircraft, it is not reasonable to expect large pieces to have survived intact given the nature of the crash.

High-Speed Crashes Reduce Aircraft to Small Pieces Few people have direct experience with the results of high-speed collisions of aircraft into strong barriers. Most aircraft accidents occur shortly after takeoff or during attempted landings, and do not completely destroy the aircraft. In contrast, uncontrolled crashes into terrain usually reduce aircraft into fine debris, leaving little if any parts identifiable by casual visual inspection. The debris fields of several jetliner crashes pictured here show the surprising paucity of apparent debris many crashes produce.

Crashes of aircraft into buildings also typically leave little in the way of large debris, as the December 5, crash of a C into an apartment building in Iran illustrates. It is noteworthy that many crashes that left very little to no large recognizable pieces involved much lower impact speeds than the Pentagon attack. Since the Iranian C was attempting to land, its airspeed was probably less than mph.

Debris from the Attack Plane is Widely Distributed The Pentagon attack produced damage covering an area inside and outside the building totaling tens of thousands of square feet. Available photographs document only small portions of this area, but nonetheless show significant quantities of debris.

Photographs show a debris field covering a portion of the lawn directly north of the central impact region of the facade, and extending to the heliport about feet from the facade.

Most of the debris in this field is small, but some photographs show pieces as big as four feet across. Unfortunately, there are relatively few public photographs of the interior of the Pentagon after the crash, and there are very few photographs showing the interior before the rescue and recovery operations had removed debris.

Skeptics of the crash of Flight 77 into the Pentagon have argued that the lack of public photographs showing airliner seats, bodies, and luggage is evidence against the crash of Flight This argument is based on several assumptions, none of which are supported. The seats, passengers, and luggage would have survived the over mph crash and subsequent fires in a form yielding to easy identification in photographs.

Remains of the seats, passengers, and luggage would have been photographed and the photographs would have been made public. The baselessness of the second assumption becomes particularly apparent when one notes that nearly the entire fuselage containing the seats, passengers, and luggage probably entered the Pentagon, where we know that Pentagon workers were killed.

Yet there are no photographs in public circulation of the remains of these victims. Summary Proponents of the no-Boeing theory have made the following claims about the debris from the crash: There was no aircraft debris.

There was insufficient aircraft debris for a jetliner crash. There was an absence of aircraft wreckage that should have survived a jetliner crash, such as pieces of wings and tail.

Claim 1 is disproved by numerous post-attack photographs of the Pentagon. Claim 2 is based on the unfounded assumptions that the quantities of debris can be established from public evidence. Claim 3 is invalidated by a review of the debris fields of any number of jetliner crashes. Claim 4 supposes that bodies, seats, and luggage should have survived in easily recognized forms, and that they would have ended up in places that were photographed.

However, the impact holes would have admitted an entire fuselage of into the building, and there is no complete photographic record of the interior wreckage available to the public. Crash Test The Sandia crash test of an F-4 into a concrete barrier reduced the plane to rubble.

This was all that was left of a Boeing after it caught fire while landing. Pentagon Debris Fields This photograph shows a portion of the lawn near the heliport.

The far end of the heliport is about feet from the facade. Debris Inside Pentagon This photograph of the C-Ring punch-out hole shows a significant quantity of aircraft debris. This photograph shows scraps of metal, some with green aircraft primer paint, piled wrapped around a damaged column. Debris in Yard This photograph shows one of the larger pieces of debris on the lawn in front of the facade.



Read the latest stories about photography on Time. The Journal of 9/11 Studies is a peer-reviewed, electronic-only journal covering research related to the events of September 11, Many fields of study are represented and all content is freely available online. Since , the Journal has presented some of the most compelling analysis and evidence related to the crimes of September 11, Today .

Total 1 comments.
#1 29.08.2018 04:13 Male:
Hurray !, the author wrote fun!