Search

PREFACE OF THE TRANSLATOR.

If aion means eternity, why does this word appear in the plural form? A wide array of "boots" —-machines variously and ingeniously designed to slowly crush feet—-are quite representative, physical punishment of children essay. And when hackers are publicly praised as geniuses, the wrong message is sent to serious students in computer science who behave ethically and who are ignored by journalists, despite the fact that the students are both smarter and more ethical than hackers. It is impossible to prevent entirely all the disorders which the passions of mankind cause in society. Thou art guilty of one crime, therefore it is possible that thou mayst have committed a thousand others: Physical punishment of children essay wide array of "boots" —-machines variously and ingeniously designed to slowly crush feet—-are quite representative. From the necessity of the esteem of others, have arisen single combats, fences essay they have been established by the anarchy of the laws.



A short synopsis of this article: There are several translations, however, some of which are listed at the end of this article, which do NOT make this mistake. This correction is crucial in regards to having a proper understanding of the nature and character of God and His role as judge. Often adjectives take on some of the value of the word they describe. Too frequently Bible teachers and students take a small portion of Scripture out of context and build an entire doctrine on it.

This is the case with Matthew The very foundation of most of modern Christianity is built upon salvation FROM eternal punishment in a place called Hell through faith in Jesus Christ. Many outstanding Christian scholars are beginning to agree with what the early believers in Christ knew that salvation through Jesus Christ was deliverance from DEATH, not from everlasting life being tormented forever.

These writings are extra-biblical. The Jews do not have these writings in their Bible, nor do most Protestant Bibles. However, these writings did get into the Septuagint Greek Old Testament used by the early church.

That is one of the ways the teaching of Hell entered into Christianity. We do NOT find such a concept in any portion of the law given to and through Moses. The Hebrew prophets know of no such a compartmentalization, nor do we find anything remotely close to such a thing in the Wisdom writings of the Old Covenant. Jesus came to empty the place of the dead. Dear reader -- the prophets, Jesus, His apostles and the early body of Christ clearly taught universal salvation through Jesus Christ, not Hell which was a concept prevalent in the pagan religions surrounding Israel.

THAT is where some Jews and Christians in a later period got the teaching of everlasting punishment — from the pagan religions around the Mediterranean basin, not from Scripture. Miles Coverdale, in the introduction to his Bible translation made a statement which, if followed, would greatly aid a student of the Bible in understanding what is written.

Most of the errors in Bible interpretation stem from neglecting a part of the following: The context of Matthew It is unclear in the gospel of Matthew when the day actually began. It could have begun in Matthew chapter 22 or In any event, in all of these chapters, Jesus is making a very startling and irritating point: Judgment was at the door.

God was about to take the kingdom of God away from the Jews and give it to another who would bear fruit, not like Israel which bore no good fruit. The Jewish leadership consisting of Pharisees, Sadducees, lawyers Bible experts , and scribes were all corrupt according to Jesus. This generation was about to be judged and found wanting and the kingdom of God would be given to another nation.

Understand that in Matthew chapter 23, where Jesus warned the multitudes NOT to be like their religious leadership who put burdens upon the poor which they are not willing to carry themselves.

There essentially was no middle class. It is hard for Western Christians to identify with the times in which Jesus lived. There were the very rich and there were the very poor.

Jesus rebuked the rich and fed, healed and taught the poor. So when Jesus ate and drank with them, He was eating with trash, according to the religious leadership. It is hard for most American Christians to imagine, but most of Church history in Europe was very much like the days of Israel.

In whatever country you lived, there was the one national church of that country. You were either a part of it or you had to leave. Freedom of religion was unheard of. And you were either very well off or very poor. There were the royalty God ordained, of course and priests on the one hand and there were the poor peasants on the other. Picture, if you will, your church with the middle class removed. The pastor, choir director, and other high leadership very well off.

Special seating for the political and military leadership who were also very well off. The rest of the people were pretty much poor. They had no say in anything including in religion and just barely survived. On top of that the church demanded that they pay 10 percent of the little that they had to the church. Plus there were the building drives, special speaker offerings, missionary offerings, etc.

Dear brothers and sisters in the Lord, there are many believers in Christ who are in this exact position today and their number is increasing as the middle class continues to shrink in America. Understand that the contexts of all of these verses at the end of the book of Matthew relate to the nation of Israel, its leadership and people. Of course one may make application of the principles found in these verses to modern times, but first let us see their application to the people to whom they were first spoken.

Personally, I believe the modern church is presently much closer to the condition of Israel in the first century than most church leadership would care to acknowledge. Go rather to the lost sheep of Israel. The conversation began after Jesus left the temple where He railed at the religious leadership of His day. In Matthew 23 we find some of the harshest language Jesus employed.

This language was NOT aimed at the average citizen. Nor was it aimed at the heathen nations surrounding Israel. It was, in fact, aimed at the Jewish leadership, the Pharisees, scribes, and lawyers. After a thorough thrashing Jesus declared to them, "I send you prophets, wise men, and scribes: He spoke these words in the temple in Jerusalem.

He then departed from the temple "And His disciples came up to show Him the buildings of the temple. The disciples were gloating over these brand new buildings because they thought they were going to rule and reign with Jesus IN these very buildings. Jesus told them, "Do you not see all these things? Assuredly, I say to you, not one stone shall be left here upon another, that shall not be thrown down. When Jesus said "Take heed that no one deceive you," Matthew ALL of what Jesus referenced occurred within the very generation He was addressing!

All those buildings to which Jesus was referring were destroyed within the very generation to which He was speaking. After rebuking the entire religious leadership of His day, Jesus wept over Jerusalem, the central city of sacrifice of the entire nation, a city filled with thousands of priests. Serpents, brood of vipers! How can you escape the condemnation of hell Greek: Gehenna, the local city dump off the Southwest wall of Jerusalem, a place for utterly worthless things where criminals were often thrown to be burned up?

Most respected people had extravagant funerals to show how important their lives were. Jesus was telling the respected of Jerusalem that their lives were worthless. After Jesus said this, they departed from the temple area, went up to the Mount of Olives which allows a grand view of the entire city, especially the temple. The disciples must have been shocked at what Jesus prophesied regarding Jerusalem and its people. Therefore they asked Him basically when was all this going to happen and what kind of signs would there be to prepare for such a horrible time.

In Matthew chapter 24, Jesus prophesied what was about to take place. I want to point out one of the critical mistakes we, Christians, often make due to faulty or archaic Bible translations. The King James Bible has the disciples ask Jesus privately, "Tell us, when shall these things be and what shall be the sign of Thy coming, and of the end of the world? If Jesus meant "world" he would have used the word "cosmos.

The Bible in its Greek form actually speaks of at least 5 "ages," NOT two worlds, the world destroyed by water and the world to be destroyed by fire. There are ages plural past Col. The generation of Jews to which Jesus came was the last generation of Jews born under the Old Covenant which was about to pass away. The form of "aion" in Matthew An adjective is a form of a word indicating possession or pertaining to.

For example, hourly pertains to "an hour. Mistranslation of "olam" as "forever" and "everlasting" in the Old Testament has given us contradictions in our modern Bibles. The Mosaic Covenant is described as "everlasting" while the book of Hebrews tells us it is has been abolished. So, too, the Levitical Priesthood which has been replaced by the Melchizedek Priesthood.

If these occurrences of "olam" had been translated correctly, we would NOT have these glaring contradictions in our Bibles. So then, Aion is an indeterminate period of time which we do not know the end of until it occurs. Hourly, for example, cannot pertain to a week, or month, or year. The "ly" indicates it belongs to an "hour. This amount of time can vary greatly, but it still must remain within the parameters of time.

Campbell Morgan, as well as other great Bible scholars have told us that the Bible does NOT speak of "eternity" as we use the term. And why should it? Jesus described "eternal life" thusly: Talk about foolish religious contradictions! This is a major one if I ever saw one! Another thing to note about adjectives is that they often take on some of their meaning from the noun they are describing.

Why then should "aionian" punishment have to be of the same duration as "aionian" zoen Divine life?



1. Introduction. Opponents of the corporal punishment of children are rightly critical of its extensive use and the severity with which it is all too often inflicted. The Holy Bible: King James Version. Psalms

Total 1 comments.
There are no comments on this entry....