Frequently bought together

One can imagine circumstances where this might be true -- the Supreme Court imposed hiring quotas on recalcitrant employers on this basis back in the day -- but university admissions in is not one of them. Texas case that race could not be a factor in admission decisions. It compromises the academic mission of the university and lowers the overall academic quality of the student body. He was against affirmative action essay in everywhere. The admissions policy was based on points, and it awarded points based on items such as race 20 pointsathletic ability 20 pointsdepth of essay up to 3 pointsagainst affirmative action essay, leadership and service up to 5 points and personal achievement up to 5 points. The remaining editors are selected on a discretionary basis.

Email [Be sure to read the Comments and replies following the article where the analysis continues. A place to begin is with the question of what affirmative action is and where it came from. It can be thought of as a response to two problems. The first problem is that racial discrimination is alive and well in the United States as documented by abundant research, especially in hiring, housing, and the financial industry.

African Americans, for example, were systematically targeted for subprime mortgages regardless of income level, and they suffered devastating losses as a result, far greater than the white population. Jamal Jones, for example. In addition, a great deal of racial discrimination is difficult to prove because the decisions involved are often subjective and not open to any kind of scrutiny, as when interviewers form personal impressions of applicants.

And the higher the position, the more subjective the decision becomes. Bias is also difficult to prove because it often operates below the level of conscious awareness, so that the person making the decision is unaware that race is playing a role.

The second problem to which affirmative action responds is that discrimination against people of color and corresponding affirmative action in favor of whites have been going on for hundreds of years. This means that unearned white advantage is not simply a result of current practices but has been accumulating across many generations.

The average net wealth of white households, for example, is now roughly 20 times that of African American and Latino households, which has a profound effect on things such as being able to send your children to college. The situation is far worse for many Native Americans who continue to live on the impoverished reservations into which they were forced more than a century ago. So, the question is, what to do in response to this? It ignores the implicit and unconscious nature of much racial discrimination and does nothing to overcome the cumulative effect of centuries of unearned white advantage.

Enter affirmative action, a federal program begun by President John F. Its purpose was to combat the exclusion of disadvantaged groups from occupations, and to help undo the effects of the long U. Most of the objections I hear focus on race.

The charge is often made that anything that takes race into account must be racist. This means that affirmative action of course must take race explicitly into account. What it does mean is that race is considered as one of a long list of criteria, with the goal of doing something, however imperfectly, to respond to the problem of racism as both a current and historical problem.

It is also not possible to undo centuries of prejudice and discrimination directed at people of color without affecting outcomes for individual whites.

In a competitive society, anything that increases the odds of success for people of color will decrease the odds of success for white people. It is simply a matter of doing the math.

Complaints from whites that this is unfair ignore the fact that the odds of success for white people have for hundreds of years been artificially boosted by the systematic disadvantaging of everyone else.

Schools also play a major role in reproducing and shaping society itself. As such, the decisions made about who will be given the opportunity for higher education affect not only individuals, but the kind of society we will have in the future. If we are to move toward a society in which inclusion and equal opportunity are the rule, then admissions decisions have a role to play in undoing the long history of white privilege. That this will sometimes conflict with the needs of individual whites is unavoidable because meeting those needs is not the only reason that universities exist.

None of this means that white people are being discriminated against simply because they are white or that affirmative action is racist. But when affirmative action programs go out of their way to identify and recruit people of color, there is no implied judgement of the white people who are turned away. Universities and employers do not reject white applicants in favor of affirmative action admissions and hires because they think whites are inferior or undeserving. Whiteness is still the norm almost everywhere in America, the cultural standard of what it is to be a normal human being.

But the most important reason to reject the argument that affirmative action is racist is that it ignores what racism actually is. The whole point of any racist practice is to preserve and enforce the privilege — the dominance and unearned advantage — of the dominant group by systematically excluding and oppressing members of the subordinate group. This has never been the purpose of affirmative action, either in theory or in practice. It has been just the opposite — a modest attempt to shift the odds away from being so heavily loaded in favor of whites in an environment that is still overwhelmingly white dominated, identified, and centered.

The result has been a relatively small number of people of color admitted to college or getting jobs in business or fire and police departments, opportunities that would otherwise be closed to them.

Over time, this has helped foster a small middle class among various peoples of color. At the same time, it is of course true that some individual white people will be turned away from opportunities because of affirmative action decisions, and this certainly has real consequences for their lives. But one of those is not that they have been discriminated against and rejected as a racist action designed to oppress whites in relation to people of color.

If there is an enemy in the struggle of white families to make a living or send their children to college, it is not the easy target of affirmative action, or of people of color who are, after all, only trying to do the same thing as best they can. The real problem, as recent history makes painfully clear, is an industrial capitalist economic system in which the interests of working families of all races have always been secondary to the accumulation of wealth and power by the upper classes.

Affirmative action can be seen as a way to lessen the harm of racism for some people of color, while also protecting the capitalist system that is not only the root cause of that harm, but also exploits and does harm to millions of white workers and their families.

It serves as a distraction from the consequences of capitalism by encouraging whites to focus their anger and frustration on people of color, and by making people of color vulnerable to accusations of not deserving what they manage to achieve. Where are all the chairs? This article may be quoted, reprinted, or distributed for noncommercial purposes only and with an attribution to Allan G.

Audrey Smedley and Brian D. Smedley, Race in North America: Origins and Evolution of a Worldview. David Roediger, The Wages of Whiteness: Race and the Making of the American Working Class. Paul Kivel, Uprooting Racism: Looking Behind the Mirror.

A sian Americans have finally had enough. They’re tired of working harder, achieving more academically, then having that held against them as they try to fulfill their educational dreams in our. For Discrimination: Race, Affirmative Action, and the Law [Randall Kennedy] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. For Discrimination is at once the definitive reckoning with one of America’s most explosively contentious and divisive issues and a principled work of advocacy for clearly defined justice. What precisely is affirmative action.

Total 3 comments.
#1 13.09.2018 â 04:37 Brianlilith:
Fur-trees, right job

#2 14.09.2018 â 12:04 Jim-Co:
Author pesha ischo

#3 19.09.2018 â 04:38 Nikkianderson101:
Wow, the one who wrote a fun published!